Skin thyself, or face obliteration.
Circumcision have been performed every since the Old Testament . Genesis 17:14 states “And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant”.Abraham was supposedly told by the so called god , that he must circumcised his self , family and servants ; and if he do not with hold the commandment of his god wishes ; then he shall been estranged from their people.
Exodus 12:48 states “And when a stranger shall sojourn with thee, and will keep the passover to the LORD, let all his males be circumcised, and then let him come near and keep it; and he shall be as one that is born in the land: for no uncircumcised person shall eat thereof”.It is considered an abomination not to remove the foreskin from an male. Ezekiel 44:7 states“ In that ye have brought into my sanctuary strangers, uncircumcised in heart, and uncircumcised in flesh, to be in my sanctuary, to pollute it, even my house, when ye offer my bread, the fat and the blood, and they have broken my covenant because of all your abominations”.
Some males even face death ,as so stated in Exodus 4:24-26 “And it came to pass by the way in the inn, that the LORD met him, and sought to kill him. 25Then Zipporah took a sharp stone, and cut off the foreskin of her son, and cast it at his feet, and said, Surely a bloody husband art thou to me. 26So he let him go: then she said, A bloody husband thou art, because of the circumcision." Skin thyself, or face obliteration.
Medical Profession are finding that removal of this foreskin , can in fact prevent many diseases. However, in some religion it is considered to be mutilation, to circumcise males. But, many are still following the Old Testament to circumcise an male child . Some are even waiting in their twenty to circumcise. Is this an good idea to wait and let the male make the decision ? Or, should that be souly up to the parent?
What are your thoughts?